List of Speakers (AEPF in Manila)

List of Speakers (AEPF in Manila)

February 12, 2018

Assuring affordable, accessible and quality Public Services for all: Tool for leveling inequality, mobilizing for transformative change!
Manila, 13-15 February 2018

Vittorio Agnoletto (Italy)

A former member of the European Parliament and part of the International Council of the World Social Forum, he is a Professor in “Globalization and Health Policies” at the University of Milan.

Alghiffari Aqsa (Indonesia)

Director of Jakarta Legal Aid Institute and member of Global Network for Public Interest Lawyers, he helped with several strategic and people-centric litigations like the Citizens Law Suit on the Right to Water that enabled the Indonesian Supreme Court to order the termination of water privatization in Jakarta and to uphold people’s fundamental right to water.

Sören Becker (Germany)

At the University of Bonn and Humboldt University, he teaches and researches on new forms of organization in energy transitions and on energy remunicipalisation that promotes democratic participation and control, and environmental sustainability.

Mae Buenaventura (Philippines)

Former director of Women’s Legal and Human Rights Bureau, she is Vice President of the Freedom from Debt Coalition and Deputy Coordinator of the Asian Peoples’ Movement on Debt and Development (APMDD), a regional alliance that led in forming the Tax and Fiscal Justice Asia.

Barry Coates (New Zealand)

The former head of Global Justice Now, Chair of the UK Trade Justice Movement and Co-Chair of the Global Campaign for Climate Action, he serves as the Green Party Member of Parliament in New Zealand.

Mladen Domazet (Croatia)

He is Research Director at the Institute for Political Ecology in Croatia which is engaged in advocacy research for the democratization, transparency, and efficiency of public services and state enterprises.

Tina Ebro (Philippines/Netherlands)

An educator and organizer since the 70s, she founded human rights platforms in the Philippines and serves as head of the Focal Point in Asia of the Asia-Europe People’s Forum.

David Hall (United Kingdom)

He is Professor in the UK and was Director of the Public Services International Research Unit that carried out for three decades the strategic Public Services and Privatization Research, globally.

Satoko Kishimoto (Japan/Belgium)

Activist researcher on water and public services at the Transnational Institute, she is editor of the following books: Our Public Water Future, and Reclaiming Public Services: How cities and citizens are turning back privatization.

Meena Menon (India)

An educator and writer, and former coordinator with Focus on the Global South in India, she founded the Urban Action School and the Citizens Rights Collective (CiRiC) which are key policy groups supporting informal labor.

Francine Mestrum (Belgium)

Founder of Global Social Justice, member of the International Council of the World Social Forum, author of books on development, poverty and social commons, she is the Link Person of the AEPF Thematic Cluster on Social Justice.

Lidy Nacpil (Philippines)

She is Coordinator of the Asian People’s Movement on Debt and Development, Co-coordinator of the Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice, and Vice President of the Freedom from Debt Coalition.

Sharad Onta (Nepal)

Professor of Community Medicine and Public Health and author of papers on public health policies, he was Nepali Health Ministry Advisor when essential health services for all were declared free.

Miriam Planas (Spain)

She works with Engineering without Borders that seeks to guarantee universal access to basic services, and Spanish Public Water Network and European Water Movement that advocates for democratic and non-commercial water management.

Charles Santiago (Malaysia)

A Malaysian Member of Parliament who Chairs the ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR), he is co-convenor of AEPF and serves as an International Organising Committee member.

Peter Ronald de Souza (India)

Currently, he is Professor at the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), former Director of the Indian Institute of Advanced Study, and was Interim Director of International Centre for Human Development, and part of Senior Expert group to prepare the report ‘Rethinking Education: Towards a global common good’ for UNESCO.

Read More

AEPF Manila Event Schedule

AEPF Manila Event Schedule

February 11, 2018

PROGRAMME

DAY 1

8:30-9:00 REGISTRATION

9:00-9:30 Welcome/Preliminaries/ Introduction

9:30-10:20 PLENARY 1 Public Services & Social/Economic Dev’t

David Hall (United Kingdom)
Rene Ofreneo (Philippines)

10:20-10:30 Coffee Break

10:30-11:20 PLENARY 2 Beyond States: Global/Regional Actors & FTAS

Barry Coates (New Zealand)

Illusion of PPPs
David Hall (United Kingdom)

11:20-12:30 OPEN FORUM

12.30-14:00 LUNCH

14:00-15:30 PLENARY 3 Sectoral Issues & Struggles

On Health
Sharad Onta (Nepal)
Vittorio Agnoletto (Italy)

On Water
Miriam Planas (Spain)
Alghiffari Aqsa (Indonesia)

On Transport
Mladen Domazet (Croatia)

15:30-16:30 Break Out Groups Health, Water & Transport

16:30-18:30 Reporting

19.00 Solidarity Dinner

DAY 2

9:30-10:20 PLENARY 3 Our Alternatives to reclaim our Public Services

Remunicipalisation and Re-nationalisation
Satoko Kishimoto (Japan/Belgium)

Social Commons: Democratization and Participation
Francine Mestrum (Belgium)

10:20-10:30 BREAK

10:30-11:20 PLENARY 4 Organising our Public Services

Financing & Real Progressive Taxation
Mae Buenaventura (Philippines)

Public Services & Labor
David Boys (France)
Deputy General Secretary of Public Services International (PSI) and recognize water authority

11:20-12:30 Open Forum

12:30-14:00 Lunch

14:00-15:30 PLENARY 5 Sectoral Issues & Struggles

On Housing /Right to the City
Meena Menon (India)
Eric Villanueva (Philippines)

On Education
Peter Ronald deSouza (India)
Raquel Castillo (Philippines)

On Energy
Sören Becker (Germany)
Lidy Nacpil (Philippines)

15:30-16:30 Break Out Groups Housing, Education and Energy

16:30-18.30 PLENARY 6 Reporting and Discussion

17:00 Dinner

DAY 3

9:00-10:30 PLENARY 7 Panel Discussion: Sharing of Campaigns and Advocacy Strategies

World Solidarity Movement
Koen Detavernier (Belgium)

ASEAN Civil Society Conference
Ed Tadem (Philippines)

Network for Transformative Social Protection
Maris dela Cruz (Philippines)

Coalition of Services of the Elderly
Aura Sevilla (Philippines)

DIGNIDAD
Rene Ofreneo (Philippines)

Freedom from Debt Coalition

10.30-11.30 Finalization of Conference Statement
Francine Mestrum (Belgium)

Summary of Salient Points and Future Actions
Tina Ebro (Philippines/Netherlands)

11.30- 12.30 Concluding Remarks
Charles Santiago (Malaysia)

12:30 LUNCH

*** NOTE

At 2.00 to 4.30pm on February 15, a RoundTable Dialogue with Legislators will be held, and this will be covered by the Media. Academics and CSO Representatives will also participate.

On February 16, RoundTable Discussions on Advocacy Strategies with key Campaigners are being planned.

On Feb. 12 at 10:00 AM a Press Conference will be conducted regarding the event, the venue is at the Marina Seafood’s Restaurant, Mother Ignacia cor. Scout Reyes Street, Quezon City.

Feb.12, 2018 – 2 PM – visit to a community of informal settlers

Feb. 15, 2018 – 2:00-4:30 PM – Roundtable Dialogue with Parliamentarians and Academics (with media coverage, UP Center for Integrative and Development Studies, Bahay ng Alumni, UP Diliman, Quezon City

Feb.16 2018 – University Hotel Cafeteria, UP Diliman, Quezon City

Small Group Discussions on specific issues (water, housing, education, health and transport) with Resource Person:

  1. On Health (with Vittorio Agnole)
  2. Water (with Miriam Planas)FDC
  3. Housing (with Meena Menon) IPD and KM
  4. Transport (with Mladen Domazet)
  5. PPPs and Privatization (David Hall)
Read More

The Indonesian Social Movement Strongly Condemns the Murder of Eight Activists in the Philippines

The Indonesian Social Movement Strongly Condemns the Murder of Eight Activists in the Philippines

September 26, 2017

The killed labor and farmer activists: Mr. Edilberto Miralles, Ms. Emerenciana Mercado-de la Cruz, Ms. Violeta Mercado, and others. de Leon, Mr. Eligio Barbado, Mr. Gaudencio Baga, Mr. Ariel Diaz, Mr. Orlando Abangan, and Mr. Arnel Figueroa. We share our deepest condolences.

We believe that the murders are politically motivated, limiting the space for civil society in the country. The incidents are clearly aimed at suppressing those who fight for people’s rights and intimidating those who fight against the tyranny of the state and the capital.

The Philippine government should protect its people from any form of violence. The extrajudicial killings in the name of the so-called was a peaceful situation in a society. Instead, they promote a culture of violence, making the government ignorant and useless in its obligation to protect and fulfill the rights of the people.

The state can no longer be silent and indifferent, especially when human rights defenders become targets of summary executions. The state has the responsibility to prevent the violation of human rights.

Therefore, we urge the Philippines to immediately stop and prevent all forms of violence. Violence does not address the roots of the problems of the society. Instead, it becomes a tool to weaken the social movement in the Philippines. The government should therefore investigate the murders objectively and fairly. It should therefore guarantee a free, democratic, and safe space for people to fight for their rights.

As we believe the violent acts against labor activists and peasant leaders are against humanity, we therefore strongly urge the Philippines’ Commission on Human Rights to be involved in the investigation of the murders.

Jakarta, 26 September 2016

In the name of the Indonesian Social Movement

  1. Indonesia for Global Justice (IGJ)
  2. The Federation of Indonesian Labor Struggle (FPBI)
  3. Sedane Labor Resource Center (LIPS)
  4. Southeast Asia Freedom of Expression Network (SafeNet)
  5. Indonesian Struggle Union (PPI)
  6. Indonesia AIDS Coalition (IAC)
  7. Indonesian Student Union (SMI)
  8. Anarkonesia
  9. SatuDunia (OneWorld)
  10. Women of Mahardhika
  11. The Federation of Cross-Factory Labor (FBLP)
  12. The People Politic (Politics Rakyat)
  13. The Federation of Independent Labor Union (FSBM)
  14. The Federation of Indonesian Labor Movement Union (FSPBI)
  15. Gema Demokrasi
  16. People Solidarity for Democracy (SORAK), Bandung
  17. PurpleCode Collective
  18. The Legal Aid of Journalist (LBH Pers)
  19. The Legal Aid of Padang Journalist (LBH Pers Padang)
  20. The Church of Grace Community-Reformed Baptist Salemba (Gereja Komunitas Anugerah Reformed Baptist Salembal
  21. Ultimus Bandung
  22. The Union of Indonesian Culture Society against Militarism
  23. The Federation of Labor Struggle Solidarity (Federasi Gabungan Solidaritas Perjuangan Buruh)
  24. The Labor Union of Jabodetabek Railway (SPKAJ Jabodetabek)
  25. The United Struggle Organization of Youth (KPOP)
  26. The Women Institute (Perempuan Institute)
  27. Rumah Belajar Rakyat
  28. Ernawati
  29. The Confederation of Indonesian People Struggle (KPRI)
  30. Initiative Association
  31. Papua Democratic People Movement
  32. Independent Forum of Papua Student (Forum Independen Mahasiswa Papua)
  33. People Movement for Democracy (GELORA DEMOCRASI, PALU)
  34. PMII metro makassar
  35. The Confederation of National Union (KSN)
  36. Confederation of Karya Utama Labor Union (FSBKU-KSN) 37. The Confederation of Indonesian People Struggle – BANTEN (KPRIVANTS) The
  37. The Union of Indonesian Farmer Movement (P3I)
  38. Forum Solidaritas Yogyakarta Damai (FSYD)
  39. Serikat buruh kerakyatan (Serbuk)
  40. PRP (Partai Rakyat Pekerja)
  41. FPBN (Federasi Perjuangan Buruh Nasional-SulSel)
  42. INKRISPENA (Research Center for Crisis and Alternative Development Strategy)
  43. Aliensi migran progresif
  44. Pusat Perjuangan Rakyat Indonesia (PPRI)
  45. Pusat Perjuangan Mahasiswa untuk Pembebasan Nasional (PEMBEBASAN)
Read More

The Asia-Europe People’s Forum Report

THE ASIA-EUROPE PEOPLE’S FORUM REPORT

July 4, 2017

THE ELEVENTH ASIA-EUROPE PEOPLE’S FORUM
Ulaan Baatar, Mongolia
4-6 July, 2016

The Asia-Europe People’s Forum (AEPF) is a biennial people’s forum parallel to the Asia-Europe Summit (ASEM) which persistently pushes for the integration of the social dimension – such as human rights, equitable development, democratization, social justice, ecological sustainability – into the ASEM processes and in the policies and practices being promoted by its member-countries at the national and inter-regional levels.

AEPF11 was organized in Ulaan Baatar, the Capital City of Mongolia’s from 4-6 July 2016 under the theme: “Building New Solidarities: Working for Inclusive, Just and Equal Alternatives for Asia and Europe”.

GENERAL OBJECTIVES

  • Strengthen network building at national and regional levels in order to undertake cross-regional initiatives and campaigns;
  • Analyse issues of common interest such as security, development and neo-liberal globalisation and their impact on peoples in each region in order to come up with visions and strategies for alternative futures;
  • Provide people’s organisations/civil society organisations and networks with a channel for critical engagement with the institutions and policies of ASEM-member countries.

PARTICIPANTS

AEPF brought together as many as 750 scholars and activists, representing social movements, people’s organisations/ civil society organisations and citizens from 42 countries across Asia and Europe, representatives of the European Union, the European Economic and Social Committee and Mongolian government. President of Mongolia, His Excellency Tsakhiagiin Elbegdorj also attended the Opening session and delivered his welcome remarks.

CONTENT OF THE AEPF

  • Opening
  • Five plenaries, focused on:
  • AEPF at 20 – Reflections and Moving Forward
  • Building solidarities for inclusive, Just, and Equal Alternatives in Asia
  • and Europe;
  • Briefing on structure, events, activities for AEPF11 and on logistics;
  • Reflections and Recommendations from Thematic Groups
  • Final Declaration presentation, debate and approval

21 workshops within the framework of seven thematic clusters, each of which had three phases:

(i) Context analysis;
(ii) Lesson learned: Successes and Failure;
(iii) Strategies for People’s Visions and Future

Perspectives:

  • Resource Justice, Land Rights, Equal Access to Water, and Participation
  • Going beyond Extractivisms;
  • Food Sovereignty/Food Security – Beyond Zero Hunger;
  • Climate Justice and Transformation of Energy Systems;
  • Socially Just Trade, Production and Investment;
  • Social Justice – Alternatives to Debt and Austerity, Social protection,
  • Decent Work, and Sustainable Livelihoods;
  • Peace Building and Human Security – Responses to Migration,
  • Fundamentalism and Terrorism;
  • Participatory Democracy, Gender Equality and Minority Rights
  • 17 Open Space sessions, during which people have in-depth discussion on specific issues.
  • Ulaan Baatar night, which discussed Brexit and its impacts on people in the two continents.
  • Closing
Read More

CLIMATE AND ENERGY – CONCEPT NOTE AND WORKSHOPS

CLIMATE AND ENERGY - CONCEPT NOTE AND WORKSHOPS

October 6, 2016

Draft CONCEPT NOTE for CLIMATE and ENERGY
Asia Europe Peoples Forum, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, July 4-6, 2016

The climate crisis has already reached the level of a planetary emergency. At nearly one-degree Celsius increase of the global average temperature since pre-industrialization – climate change has already been causing massive loss, destruction and destabilization of ecosystems and communities all over the world but most especially in the South.

Several years ago, climate justice movements were calling for urgent actions that would keep temperature rise to below one degree Celsius. Many scientists are now saying that this is no longer physically possible. They say there is still a chance to stabilize the earth’s temperature to below 1.5 degrees Celsius but this will require huge changes and achieving very high targets in the short term.

The Paris Climate Agreement forged last December 2015 stipulates this 1.5 degrees Celsius limit as the aspirational goal of all parties to the agreement. This is being hailed as an important achievement – as indeed this is the most ambitious goal every agreed to by governments. However, the concrete mitigation targets submitted by governments that form a major part of the Paris Agreement fall very short of this 1.5 degree goal. The collective impact of these national targets condemn the world to a 3-degree rise in global temperatures.

More than every, addressing climate change urgently requires peoples movements to intensify, scale up and escalate all efforts for a comprehensive transformation of the global capitalist system which gave rise to this crisis. Such efforts must also aim for concrete short term and medium term victories. What the world will do in the next 5 to 12 years will determine whether the 1.5 degree limit will still be possible, whether we will still have a chance to prevent climate catastrophe.

A crucial sector where major changes should take place immediately and where complete transformation should be completed the in the soonest possible time is Energy.

Many communities and movements in Asia and in Europe are fighting long-standing battles to stop dirty energy and harmful projects. Others are engaged in resisting privatization and corporatization of energy services and fighting for peoples’ right to energy for their basic needs. And increasingly, movements across these energy issues are uniting around calling for the transition to renewable, efficient and democratic energy alternatives for people and communities – as swiftly as possible in a just manner that ensures that workers and communities are not displaced and dislocated — as all are being made aware of the urgency of addressing climate change. Studies indicate that if we are to keep temperature rise to below 1.5 or even 2 degrees – there is just a fixed amount of carbon the world can still emit which requires that most of the current fossil fuel reserves should be kept in the ground.

A dangerous response to the climate crisis is the promotion of false solutions. The danger stems from the following 1) these solutions do not represent real or reliable results 2) these solution become an excuse or a substitute for taking real effective actions 3) these solutions carry other dangers and other harmful impacts on people and the environment 4) these solutions exacerbate inequality and make it possible for elites and corporations to gain profit from climate change and its impacts.

The sessions on Climate and Energy at the AEPF will involve an exchange of information, analysis and perspectives on the Climate Crisis and transformation of Energy Sytems.

There will be three sessions.

Session One:

  1. The current state of play in the climate front and the requirements for stabilizing the earth’s temperature at the safest level still possible — below 1.5 degrees –
  2. What these mean for the transformation of energy systems

Session Two

  1. The current energy situation in Asia and Europe
  2. What movements are doing for energy transformation – resisting dirty energy and breaking free from fossil fuels, opposing false solutions, working for swift and just transition to renewable energy systems for communities and people

Session Three

  1. Exploring and developing concrete joint strategies and strengthening joint actions in the next months and years

Note: The Thematic Cluster ‘Climate Justice – Towards Sustainable Energy Production and Use’ is being coordinated by Rivers Without Boundaries (Mongolia), Asian People’s Movement on Debt and Development, Indian Social Action Forum (INSAF), and Transnational Institute (The Netherlands).

Read More

Documentary video on AEPF11

Documentary video on AEPF11

September 18, 2016

The National Organising Committee for AEPF11 commissioned a documentary video, which is available now. Produced by Nara, a journalist at Marshal Creative Studio, it captures the spirit, the themes, the people and the voices of AEPF11 – just have a look via this link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1lWvOe0VxU.

Read More

I thought I could get away from Brexit in Outer Mongolia…. I was wrong

I thought I could get away from Brexit in Outer Mongolia…. I was wrong

August 4, 2016

by Alex Scrivener, Global Justice Now, 13 July 2016

Outer Mongolia has, like Timbuktu, always been one of those places well known (from an anglo-centric perspective) for being very far away from the UK. However, the Asia-Europe People’s Forum held in Ulaanbaatar wasn’t far enough away for the subject of Brexit not to be an ever-present shadow over discussions.

The Asia-Europe People’s Forum (AEPF) is held to coincide with ASEM, the high-level meeting of political leaders from Asia and Europe held once every two years. It brings together civil society from across both continents to, as the official byline of the conference states, ‘build new solidarities’.

Usually at these kinds of events, the main aim for people like me coming from the UK is to listen to voices from the global south that are insufficiently well heard in our own country. We try to play a humble role – seeking to coordinate with allies from the global south in ways that will strengthen our collective hand in battles with multinationals or our own governments. The intricacies of UK politics are rarely centrally important or even very relevant to the social movements and civil society organisations that frequent such gatherings. In other words, rightly or wrongly, as Brits we are used to be being givers rather than receivers of solidarity.

But there was a big difference this time. Brexit had thrust the UK uncomfortably into the limelight. It was us who now needed the solidarity and support from our Asian and European allies. People from all over Europe and Asia wanted to discuss what had happened and how this would impact upon the wider movement. A special meeting was held one evening to discuss Brexit at which those of us from the UK were called upon to explain what had happened.

Some of the contributions from Asia were amongst the most interesting. There were questions about the implications of Brexit on regional integration in other parts of the world. What are the implications going to be for bodies like ASEAN, the group of southeast Asian countries seeking integration on a model similar to that of the EU? Could trouble in the EU put a stop to integration in other parts of the world? There were also worries about the rising tide of anti-immigration feeling with anecdotal evidence that, since the referendum was called, Asian people are already being denied visitor visas in much larger numbers. From some of the Europeans, feelings of intense sorrow about Brexit came alongside the feeling that maybe, just maybe, with one of Europe’s most neoliberal states out of the way, it would now be possible to build a more progressive Europe without us.

But overall the attitude towards those of us from the UK was one of overwhelming solidarity. It felt incredibly good to be part of this extended civil society family at this time. And it left me with the strong feeling that we must ensure that we live up to our side of the bargain. Post-Brexit UK is very likely to fall back on even more exploitative trade relations with countries in Asia than has been the case until now. There is a huge risk of climate change targets being abandoned in the rush to secure growth at all costs. Already corporation tax is being lowered and financial regulation may be further liberalised as the UK positions itself to be a massive tax haven for multinationals and hedge funds. If we fail to fight this, the impact could be disastrous and will be felt hardest by those living in the global south. We have a responsibility to respond to the wave of solidarity from our friends across the world with action to fight the worst effects of Brexit.

Of course, having said all this, there was a lot more to the AEPF than discussions of Brexit. The meeting was a fascinating opportunity to talk to people and organisations I would never otherwise have had to opportunity to have met. It was also a brilliant opportunity to exchange ideas and test new approaches with a diverse and friendly group of people.

For example, at a migration event I was invited to speak at, I set out Global Justice Now’s position that the so called ‘migrant crisis’ in Europe is in fact a crisis of poverty and inequality and that we need free movement for people from the global south. I went in not knowing what to expect. But I needn’t have worried. There was broad agreement about what we needed to call for. I heard Indians talk about their struggle against the rising tide of racism set off by their nationalist BJP government. I heard a Berlin city councillor talk of how he had personally worked to set up accommodation for Syrian refugees. And I heard much criticism of southeast Asian governments’ refusal to take in Rohingya refugees from Burma who had been left floating in the Andaman Sea, much like their counterparts in the Mediterranean. This other refugee crisis, almost unreported in the West, is a strong reminder that this is a global struggle, not just a European one. And the fact the meeting was in Mongolia was quite an inspiration, considering its strong nomadic lifestyle that has free movement at its core.

At another event on trade deals and climate change, there was a fascinating discussion on strategies for combating extreme neoliberal deals like TTIP and their impact upon climate change. The most interesting debate centred around what sort of alternatives we should be pushing for. Is it enough for us to simply be resisting deals like TTIP and TPP? Should we start advocating for alternative, progressive multilateral frameworks on trade or does this agenda risk being co-opted by powerful interests?

And there were many contributions from Mongolians about the problems surrounding extractive industries polluting the environment in the country. Unfortunately, I didn’t get a lot of opportunity to venture far beyond the city of Ulaanbaatar, what little I did see did make me understand why extractivism is felt especially painfully by people in this society that prides itself on its relationship with its beautiful environment.

So while any personal hopes I may have harboured on my way to Mongolia of putting Brexit out of my mind were not fulfilled, for me, the AEPF did genuinely live up to its billing as a place to build new solidarities. If we are to get anywhere in this increasingly uncertain world, we are going to need as much of it as we can get.

Link: Global Justice Now

Read More

AEPF11 Statement at the Opening of 11th ASEM Summit

AEPF11 Statement at the Opening of 11th ASEM Summit

August 4, 2016

By Tina Ebro, on behalf of AEPF11, member of AEPF International Organising Committee (IOC)

Your Excellencies,

For 20 years, the Asia-Europe People’s Forum, has been a strategic gathering of Asian and European civil society networks pursuing democratisation, human rights, and social, economic and climate justice. AEPF11 held on 4th to 6th July in Ulaanbaatar was honoured by the full support and presence of the President of Mongolia and Chair of ASEM who stressed at the opening session, the importance of people’s participation in realizing inclusive and sustainable development. Under the main theme “Building New Solidarities: Working for Inclusive, Just and Equal Alternatives in Asiaand Europe,” 750 citizens from civil society, trade unions, academics and some parliamentarians from 42 countries engaged in constructive exchanges, and adopted the AEPF11 Final Declaration that we respectfully submit to the 11th ASEM Summit. We share four main points.

Firstly, we raise urgent concerns that human rights defenders and citizens face in countries where democratic space is shrinking like Kam Ley in Cambodia and Gloria Kapitan in the Philippines.

One, the enforced disappearance, almost 4 years ago, of AEPF9 main organiser Sombath Somphone. We urge the Lao PDR Government to complete its investigation, make public the result, and take forward appropriate legal actions against those responsible for his disappearance. Please return Sombath safely to his friends and family.

Two, we ask ASEM members to exert significant pressure on the military regime in Thailand to restore human rights including freedom of speech and assembly the right to campaign on the constitutional referendum, and to return democracy to the people.

Secondly, what has been presented as a ‘financial crisis’ is actually multi-faceted and interlinked crises – food, energy climate, social and human security, and ecological destruction – that are devastating the lives of millions across Asia and Europe.

We met at a time of growing inequalities, injustices and turmoil world-wide. There was a strong consensus at AEPF11 that the dominant development approach over the last decades – based around deregulation of markets, trade liberalisation, the privatisation of essential services and resources – has failed to meet peoples’ needs and rights, and contributed to climate change with its catastrophic consequences. This development approach has caused massive joblessness, exploitation and informalisation of labour, hunger, lack of basic services and social security, and the plunder of natural commons for the benefit of an extreme minority. These give rise to exclusion, polarisation, racism, xenophobia, terrorism, armed conflicts, and people’s displacement and migration.

Transnational corporations and multilateral institutions have become even more powerful, gaining significant control over our lives, leading to a hollowing out of democratic accountability and contributing to making the financial system so unregulated and unaccountable. Corporations must therefore adopt democratic mechanisms and respect human rights.

This development approach needs to be transformed – to go beyond endless growth and relentless capital accumulation – so that peoples can live freely in peace and dignity, restore their relationship with nature, and renew solidarity amongst peoples and nations. The need for change is urgent and fundamental.

Thirdly, we urge governments to heed the People’s Visions and urgent demands including:

  • Implement universal and comprehensive social protection guaranteeing decent work, food, essential services and adequate income to vulnerable groups. Reverse the privatisation of essential services especially healthcare, education, and water, and implement just fiscal policies including financial transaction tax, closure of tax havens,and the cancelation of illegitimate debts.
  • Stop land grabbing, implement Agrarian Reform and support small farmers.
  • Halt all negotiations based on current trade and investment protection frameworks until an alternative, inclusive and sustainable model is established. Withdraw the inclusion of the extremely dangerous element of the Investor-State Dispute Settlement mechanism.
  • Stop dirty energy, and develop alternative renewable energy sources and other concrete short and
    medium term plans for appropriate emissions reduction to achieve the 1.50C limit.
  • Welcome Mongolia’s nuclear-weapons-free status and expand the nuclear-weapon free zone. Cut military spending by at least ten per cent in the next five years. Settle disputes and conflicts by peaceful means in areas such as Ukraine, Korean Peninsula, and in the South and East China Sea.
  • Respect the rights of migrants and refugees, and adopt legal and political frameworks which allow them safe movement. Share responsibility to cope with present humanitarian crisis.
  • Support civil society organizations, and citizen-led democratic processes including mechanisms for direct democracy, gender equality and participation of youth, women, LGBTI and differently abled people, as well as ethnic, religious and other minorities.

Finally, at this critical juncture, States with political will, to put people’s welfare at the center of policy-making are a must.ASEM in its 20th year has an historic opportunity to encourage governments to take bold steps and work together with civil society in realizing peoples’ alternatives towards a multi-polar world that is inclusive, just, equal, and ecologically sustainable world. Please, seize this opportunity.

Read More

Building New Solidarities in Mongolia: Asia-Europe People’s Forum 2016

Building New Solidarities in Mongolia: Asia-Europe People’s Forum 2016

July 28, 2016

by Niels Jongerius and Matthijs Peters (TNI), 28 July 2016

Between 4 and 6 July, over 750 activists, academics, social movements and civil society representatives from all over Asia and Europe gathered in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia to share national and international struggles, exchange ideas and build new alliances during the Asia-Europe People’s Forum(AEPF).

The event, organised ahead of the 11th Asia-Europe Meeting for heads of states (ASEM), offered a valuable space for activists from both regions to share experiences and develop proposals for common coordination and actions. For TNI, which was co-initiator of the very first 1996 AEPF in Bangkok and has had a presence at the event ever since, the meetings in Ulaanbaatar provided a valuable opportunity to continue building convergences on shared struggles and connect with likeminded movements.

For 20 years, the AEPF has provided a unique and dynamic platform for dialogue and exchange between European and Asian people’s movements. Its first edition was organised by social movements to create a counter voice to the first ASEM meeting in 1996 in Bangkok and to stress the importance of a people’s voice during such summits. Since then, the AEPF has become a recurring bi-annual event preceding the ASEM meetings, which is organised alternatingly in Asia and Europe. Its network has expanded over the years, with new movements and organisations being mobilized with each meeting. The aims of the AEPF are to strengthen activists’ networks across Europe and Asia, analyse issues of common interest and provide people’s networks with a channel for critical engagement.

This year’s AEPF was kicked off by an opening ceremony in Mongolia’s presidential palace on Genghis Khan Square, the heart of the country’s capital city. Speeches by the Mongolian president, representatives from the national and international organising committees and other activists highlighted the importance of the forum for giving a voice to thousands of people across the two continents. The ceremony included a strong declaration on behalf of Ng Shui Meng, the wife of Sombath Somphone who coordinated the 2012 AEPF in Laos and whose forced disappearance remains a great concern to activists from both Asia and Europe. Somphone’s disappearance exemplified the fierce repression and criminalization that many activists are dealing with in their struggles today. His wife’s declaration therefore signified a symbolic start towards three days of exchanges and network building aimed at strengthening those struggles and countering such repressions in the future.

Over the course of three days, more than 500 Mongolians from all over the country, together with 250 international guests were active in a large number of workshops and meetings. The workshops were organized around seven thematic clusters that encompassed current global struggles such as climate justice; land and resource grabbing cases and peace and security issues. Moreover, space was also provided to discuss more recent developments such as China’s growing influence both in Asia and globally, or the ‘Brexit’ vote and its implications for progressives across the world. These issues led to vigorous, and at times heated discussions between both Asian and European participants. Especially the active participation by Mongolian civil society members and academics, whose engagement and critical approach to national and international policies was inspiring, made for lively debates and interesting exchanges of experiences and further proposals. Many of the discussions during the workshops also showed how Mongolia’s socio-economic and political governance issues related to major concerns in both Asian and European countries.

Since the 1990’s, Mongolia’s economy has been the subject of a widespread liberalization programme aimed at opening up the country’s markets and allowing in foreign investment. Like many other countries, Mongolia’s transition to a market-economy in the past decades has led to increasing wealth inequalities along with increasing corporate influence. Due to the country’s abundant natural resources, foreign direct investment has been focused almost exclusively on the extraction industries, with coal, gold and rare earth minerals much sought after. Minerals represent about 80% of the total value of the country’s exports. In the past years, transnational corporations from mostly Western countries have become a dominant player in the country’s mining sector, thereby extracting the country’s wealth while grabbing land and resources and causing environmental degradation and social conflicts. Mongolian governments have made attempts in the past years to regulate the mining sector. However, a new study from TNI that was launched during the AEPF shows how foreign companies have answered these attempts with investment claims at international arbitration courts.

Mongolia’s struggles share a familiar pattern in both Asian and European countries, where the increasing neoliberalisation of policies and society has marked a preference of the market over the interests of people and the environment. In this context, the contributions by Mongolian participants gave rise to interesting discussions on how to work together to counteract these developments in both regions and support affected people at local level. The struggle of Mongolian social movements against investment claims and trade and investment deals brought local struggles in convergence with for instance the European battles against TTIP and CETA, and the joint resistance against EU-Asian countries agreements and TPP, the trade and investment agreement between Pacific countries and the United States.

With a special focus on the mining industry, there was an interesting dialogue between mainly Asian countries resisting the extractive industries. These discussions focused on the vulnerability of countries to protect their territories from Transnational Corporations and the struggles of communities to prevent companies from taking their lands and livelihoods or causing environmental damages. Mongolian, Philippine and Kyrgyzstani together with German, Romanian and British activists discussed how to better prevent destructive mining, reject the myth of responsible mining and develop common campaign strategies against mining giants operating in their respective countries, which are the same in most of the cases. Participants also identified the threat of trade and investment agreements to their struggles, through the possibility for TNCs to sue states and undermine peoples’ resistances.

The common challenges to tackle the climate crisis and move towards a sustainable energy model were discussed among organizations from both regions, who exchanged experiences of their local strategies and planned some common proposals to stop false solutions, promote real solutions and demand urgent action from governments.

In order to better understand the struggles and promote exchange with anti-mining activists, but also to reflect upon the activities of small-scale miners in Mongolia, TNI members and other European activists also had the chance to travel to Mongolia’s rural areas in the days following the AEPF, to engage with and learn from both sides. The trip included meetings with artisan and cooperative miners as well as social and environmental activists resisting the damaging operations of transnational mining corporations.

After three days of intense but refreshing discussions, a Final Declaration was presented, which reflected the ideas and outcomes of the forum. Some notable issues drawn up in the statement included a call to ASEM countries to put pressure on the Lao government in order to ensure that Somphone and his family receive the justice they deserve and to put pressure on the military regime in Thailand to return to a democratic and just state respectful of human rights. Another key issue included in the declaration was a strong call upon the ASEM governments to support the campaign for a treaty to stop corporate impunity. The Final Declaration was ultimately presented during the opening ceremony of the ASEM11 on 15 July 2016.

TNI

Read More